Sebanyak 1173 item atau buku ditemukan

Pengembangan Bahan Ajar

Konsep Bahan Ajar, Peran Bahan Ajar Dalam Pembelajaran, Jenis Jenis Bahan Ajar, Hubungan Antara Alat Peraga, Media Pembelajaran, Sumber Belajar, Dan Bahan Ajar, Prinsip-Prinsip Pengembangan Bahan Ajar, Langkah-Langkah Pengembangan Bahan Ajar, Model-Model Pengembangan Bahan Ajar, Isi Bahan Ajar, Prinsip Merancang Bahan Ajar Cetak, Prinsip Merancang Bahan Ajar Audio, Prinsip Merancang Bahan Ajar Video Dan Tes Formatif Dan Tes Sumatif Bahan Ajar

Pada Tahun 2021 mulai menempuh pendidikan S-3 program studi Pendidikan Agama Islam di universitas yang sama. Selain menempuh studi, Ia juga sedang mengemban amanah sebagai dosen tetap dengan memberikan mata kuliah Pendidikan Agama Islam ...

Nilai-Nilai dan Praktik Moderasi Beragama Berbasis Kearifan Lokal di Sumatera Utara

Indonesia memilki sejarah kelam dalam hubungan antar agama, padahal negeri ini terkenal sebagai negeri yang santun dan toleran. Setidaknya terjadi kerusuhan Poso di Sulawesi Tengah yang melibatkan kelompok muslim dan Kristen pada Desember 1998 dan April-Juni 2000. Kerusuhan yang terjadi beberapa fase inisebenarnya disebabkan oleh miskomunikasi bukan karena faktor agama (Mappangara, 2000). Namun begitu konflik membesar kedua kelompok agama tersebut saling berhadap-hadapan dalam pertikaian fisik, bahkan saling membunuh. Kejadian lain yang ditengarai sebagai konflik agama terbesar dalam sejarah sosial-politik di Indonesia terjadi di Ambon pada tahun 1999. Konflik ini telah berlalu namun terkadang masih muncul letupan-letupan kecil hingga tahun 2011

Indonesia memilki sejarah kelam dalam hubungan antar agama, padahal negeri ini terkenal sebagai negeri yang santun dan toleran.

Dimensi Islam dan Moderasi Beragama: Mewujudkan Islam yang Damai, Toleran dan Inklusif

Naskah buku ini sebagian besar materinya berasal dari sejumlah referensi yang dikombinasikan dengan resultan kontemplasi penulis untuk menggapai wajah Islam yang damai, toleran, dan inklusif. Semangat moderasi beragama adalah untuk mencari titik temu dua kutub ekstrem dalam beragama. Di satu sisi, ada pemeluk agama yang ekstrem meyakini mutlak kebenaran satu tafsir teks agama, seraya menganggap sesat penafsir selainnya. Kelompok ini biasa disebut ultra-konservatif. Di sisi lain, ada juga umat beragama yang esktrem mendewakan akal hingga mengabaikan kesucian agama, atau mengorbankan kepercayaan dasar ajaran agamanya demi toleransi yang tidak pada tempatnya kepada pemeluk agama lain. Mereka biasa disebut ekstrem liberal. Keduanya perlu dimoderasi. Karenanya, untuk menjadikan moderasi beragama sebagai solusi, kita perlu memiliki pemahaman yang benar tentang makna kata tersebut, dan untuk keperluan itulah buku Islam dan moderasi beragama ini disusun. Moderasi telah lama menjadi aspek yang menonjol dalam sejarah peradaban dan tradisi semua agama di dunia. Masing-masing agama niscaya memiliki kecenderungan ajaran yang mengacu pada satu titik makna yang sama, yakni bahwa memilih jalan tengah di antara dua kutub ekstrem, dan tidak berlebih-lebihan, merupakan sikap beragama yang paling ideal.

Naskah buku ini sebagian besar materinya berasal dari sejumlah referensi yang dikombinasikan dengan resultan kontemplasi penulis untuk menggapai wajah Islam yang damai, toleran, dan inklusif.

KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM

ARTI kata “kompilasi” menurut Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia adalah kumpulan yang tersusun secara teratur (tentang daftar informasi, karangan, dan sebagainya). Kemudian jika dilihat dari kacamata hukum, Abdurrahman (2015) mengartikan “kompilasi” sebagai sebuah buku hukum atau buku kumpulan yang memuat uraian atau bahan-bahan hukum tertentu, pendapat hukum, atau juga aturan hukum.

ARTI kata “kompilasi” menurut Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia adalah kumpulan yang tersusun secara teratur (tentang daftar informasi, karangan, dan sebagainya).

Redefining Family Law in India

This volume is a collection of articles by scholars across disciplines to create a discourse of family law independent of Religious Personal Law, whilst striving for fairness and justice to all. It demonstrates the artificiality of the public–private divide and seeks the systematic development of ideas for a fair and just family law in contemporary India. The book does not merely document the pathologies of power within the family but also makes proposals for remedying these inequities. It is not confined to considering what changes need to be inducted into existing family law to make it more just, but also strategises on the means and methods of effecting the change. It lifts the familial veil and scrutinises the status, rights and disabilities of some of the subordinated members of the family. The volume is an invitation to redefine family law with the twin tools of reflection and responsibility. It will interest those in law judges, legislators, law reformers as well as those in women and family studies, policy makers and policy analysts, apart from the general reader.

This volume is a collection of articles by scholars across disciplines to create a discourse of family law independent of Religious Personal Law, whilst striving for fairness and justice to all.

Redefining Family Law in India

Essays in Honour of B. Sivaramayya

'Family Law' refers to the set of legal rules which are in practice in India with regards to 'family' issues - marriage, divorce, inheritance, etc. This volume is a collection of articles by different scholars across disciplines to generate a discourse on just Family Law. Main features: it is an inter-disciplinary collection of articles on family law - not just by lawyers or legal specialists but includes political scientists, sociologists, economists, anthropologists, religion specialists, etc. it is concerned with a just family law that moves beyond a uniform civil code. Has a strong but not exclusive focus on women and women's issues. The authors demonstrate that substantive rules such as a just family law, in addition to being inclusive, would make connections between the structure of the family and in the wider economic, political and social institutions. Secondly, they challenge the myths about the private sphere as the sphere of non-regulation by law in order to demonstrate that just a family law can be compatible with freedom of conscience. The authors here are seeking to create a discourse on family law that accommodates diversity and is context-sensitive. However, most of the contemporary legal theory questions the role of law in achieving justice, and there is a pervasive view that cultural diversity is more valuable than a state-imposed family law. This argument is addressed from various standpoints to show that cultural plurality can be pursued in many other ways and a just family law is the minimum condition for a fair resolution of disputes, if and when they do rise. This book does not just document the pathologies of power within the family but also makes proposals for remedying these inequities. It is not confined to considering what changes need to be inducted into existing family law to make it more just, but also strategises on the means and methods of effecting the change. It seeks to break the silences prevailing in relation to some excluded groups, whose existence is not even acknowledged by contemporary family law.

This volume is a collection of articles by different scholars across disciplines to generate a discourse on just Family Law.

Caring for Families in Court

An Essential Approach to Family Justice

In many US courts and internationally, family law cases constitute almost half of the trial caseload. These matters include child abuse and neglect and juvenile delinquency, as well as divorce, custody, paternity, and other traditional family law issues. In this book, the authors argue that reforms to the family justice system are necessary to enable it to assist families and children effectively. The authors propose an approach that envisions the family court as a "care center," by blending existing theories surrounding court reform in family law with an ethic of care and narrative practice. Building on conceptual, procedural, and structural reforms of the past several decades, the authors define the concept of a unified family court created along interdisciplinary lines — a paradigm that is particularly well suited to inform the work of family courts. These prior reforms have contributed to enhancing the family justice system, as courts now can shape comprehensive outcomes designed to improve the lives of families and children by taking into account both their legal and non-legal needs. In doing so, courts can utilize each family’s story as a foundation to fashion a resolution of their unique issues. In the book, the authors aim to strengthen a court’s problem-solving capabilities by discussing how incorporating an ethic of care and appreciating the family narrative can add to the court’s effectiveness in responding to families and children. Creating the court as a care center, the authors conclude, should lie at the heart of how a family justice system operates. The authors are well-known figures in the area and have been involved in family court reform on both a US national and an international scale for many years.

In this book, the authors argue that reforms to the family justice system are necessary to enable it to assist families and children effectively.

An Interdisciplinary Approach to Family Law Jurisprudence

Application of an Ecological and Therapeutic Perspective

Traditionally, the legal system has attempted to fashion morality in determining family legal issues rather than to devise legal remedies that accommodate how families live. This approach must change, and a new approach based on legal realism that effectuates the well-being of families and children must be developed. This article proposes an interdisciplinary approach based on an ecological and therapeutic jurisprudential paradigm to resolve family legal proceedings. An ecological approach, emanating from the ecology of human development social science paradigm, is one in which family law decision-makers consider factors beyond their conceptions of the family. This approach urges decision-makers to account for the "family ecology," which includes the institutions within which family members participate, such as neighborhoods and religious organizations. Utilizing an ecological approach to family law jurisprudence implies that decision-makers appreciate the importance of socially rich environments for family members and facilitate linkages between and among as many systems in litigants' lives as possible. The therapeutic jurisprudential paradigm emerges from the field of mental health law and looks at the role of law as a therapeutic agent. The author urges that family law decision-makers consider outcomes that have therapeutic or positive consequences for families and children. To employ this interdisciplinary ecological and therapeutic framework, the court system must accommodate a range of dispute resolution techniques, including negotiation, mediation, and adjudication, allowing the judge to strike a balance between the parties' own resolution and a full court trial of family law issues. An interdisciplinary paradigm for family law jurisprudence that applies the ecology of human development perspective and notions of therapeutic jurisprudence can ensure that family law decision-makers and the courts are a source of strength and support for the continued and enhanced functioning of America's families.

Traditionally, the legal system has attempted to fashion morality in determining family legal issues rather than to devise legal remedies that accommodate how families live.